Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more



Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:

$33723

Still Needed:

$41277

Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington


Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.


Summary Details


Query:   Grammar Texts for English Ed Teachers
Author:  Larry LaFond
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Applied Linguistics

Summary:   On 02-Feb-2005, I posted an inquiry regarding potential English grammar
texts for students who are preparing to become English education teachers.
Below is a summary of responses to that inquiry.

Respondents discussed texts that they had used or are intending to use.

Eleven different texts were mentioned:

Barry, Anita. 2002. English grammar: language as human behavior. 2nd
edition Pearson Education.

Berk, Lynn. 1999. English syntax: from word to discourse. Oxford
University Press.

Clark, Mary. 2003. The structure of English for readers, writers and
teachers. College Publishing.

Denham, Kristin and Anne Lobeck. (eds.) 2005. Language in the schools:
integrating linguistic knowledge into K-12 teaching. L. Erlbaum Associates.

Disterheft, Dorothy. 2004. Advanced grammar: a manual for students.
Prentice-Hall.

Emery, Donald, Kierzek, John, and, Peter Lindblom. 2004. English
fundamentals. 13th ed. Longman.

Gelderen, Elly van. 2002. An introduction to the grammar of English:
syntactic arguments and socio-historical background. John Benjamins.

Kaplan, Jeffrey. 1995. English grammar: principles and facts. 2nd ed.
Prentice Hall.

Klammer, Thomas P., Muriel R. Schulz, & Angela Della Volpe. 2004. Analyzing
English grammar. 4th ed. Allyn & Bacon.

Kolln, Martha and Robert Funk. 1998. Understanding English grammar. 5th ed.
Allyn and Bacon.

Loebeck, Anne. 2000. Discovering grammar: an introduction to English
sentence structure. Oxford.

Riley, Kathryn and Frank Parker. 1998. English grammar: prescriptive,
descriptive, generative, performative. Allyn and Bacon. [out of print]

There were a number of recurrent themes in the responses. Several people
chose a text based on how user-friendly it was and the degree to which it
specifically addressed the needs of undergraduates (Barry and van Gelderen
were cited), others were more concerned with the level of detail or
traditional presentation of grammatical facts (Emery, et al, and Kaplan
were cited). A few respondents focused on texts that eclectically drew upon
insights from different theories of language and led students to think
critically and analyze, rather than just memorize (Kammer, et al., was cited).

The most frequent complaints about texts arose from confusing layouts, lack
of depth, or level of difficulty. Many also wanted texts that contained
some specific features, for example the use of both generative-style tree
and Reed-Kellogg sentence (e.g., Riley and Parker and Kammer, et al.) or
the inclusion of exercises. The inclusion of exercises was, in fact, a
frequent theme among respondents, and many of the texts on the above list
have accompanying pedagogical aids such as instructor's manuals, teaching
suggestions, study guides, exercises, and answer keys. Some include
publisher-sponsored websites with additional instructional aids.

Thanks to James Vanden Bosch, Lynn Burley, Susan Burt, Dorothy Disterheft,
Stan Dubinsky, Marina Gorlach, Joel Hardman, Paul Justice, and Johanna
Rubba for their responses. Please forgive if anyone's response has been
inadvertently omitted.

Larry LaFond
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
llafond@siue.edu

LL Issue: 16.420
Date Posted: 11-Feb-2005
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page