LINGUIST List 19.700
Sun Mar 02 2008
Diss: Morphology: Steriopolo: 'Form and Function of Expressive Morp...'
Editor for this issue: Evelyn Richter
<evelynlinguistlist.org>
1. Olga
Steriopolo,
Form and Function of Expressive Morphology: A case study of Russian
Message 1: Form and Function of Expressive Morphology: A case study of Russian
Date: 02-Mar-2008
From: Olga Steriopolo <olgasteriopolohotmail.com>
Subject: Form and Function of Expressive Morphology: A case study of Russian
E-mail this message to a friend
Institution: University of British Columbia
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2008
Author: Olga Steriopolo
Dissertation Title: Form and Function of Expressive Morphology: A case study of Russian
Dissertation URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/424
Linguistic Field(s):
Morphology
Subject Language(s): Russian (rus)
Dissertation Director:
Martina Wiltschko
Hotze Rullmann
Gunnar Ólafur Hansson
Dissertation Abstract:
I conduct a detailed case study of expressive suffixes in Russian. I showthat although the suffixes under investigation have the same function("expressive"), they differ significantly in their formal properties. Iidentify two major semantic types of expressive suffixes: attitude and sizesuffixes. Attitude suffixes convey an attitude of the speaker toward thereferent. Size suffixes both convey an attitude and refer to the size ofthe referent.
I argue that the two different semantic types map onto different syntactictypes. Attitude suffixes are syntactic heads, while size suffixes aresyntactic modifiers. As heads, attitude suffixes determine the formalproperties (syntactic category, grammatical gender and inflectional class)of the derived form. As modifiers, size suffixes do not determine theformal properties of the derived form. Attitude suffixes can attach both tocategory-free √Roots and to categories (n/a/v), while size suffixes canonly attach to a noun category.
I investigate the functional and formal properties of Russian expressivesuffixes in a systematic way, which has not been done before. In doing so,I analyze how expressive suffixes pattern along several kinds of criteria(gender/class change, category change, subcategorization). An importantbyproduct of this analysis is that I show how grammatical gender of anexpressive form can be predicted from its inflectional class (combined withanimacy and natural gender of the base).
One implication of this analysis is that I show that the formal propertiesof expressives are no different from those of non-expressives(descriptives), as both expressives and descriptives can attach as heads ormodifiers either to √Roots or categories. Another implication is that theformal criteria which I develop for a small set of expressive suffixes inRussian can be extended to set up a cross-linguistic typology of expressives.
|